CoPixie, a novel algorithm for single-particle track colocalization, enables efficient quantification of telomerase dynamics at telomeres
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Single-particle imaging and tracking can be combined with colocalization analysis to study the dynamic interactions between macromolecules in living cells. Indeed, single-particle tracking has been extensively used to study protein-DNA interactions and dynamics. Still, unbiased identification and quantification of binding events at specific genomic loci remains challenging. Herein, we describe CoPixie, a new software that identifies colocalization events between a theoretically unlimited number of imaging channels, including single-particle movies. CoPixie is an object-based colocalization algorithm that relies on both pixel and trajectory overlap to determine colocalization between molecules. We employed CoPixie with live-cell single-molecule imaging of telomerase and telomeres, to test the model that cancer-associated POT1 mutations facilitate telomere accessibility. We show that POT1 mutants Y223C, D224N or K90E increase telomere accessibility for telomerase interaction. However, unlike the POT1-D224N mutant, the POT1-Y223C and POT1-K90E mutations also increase the duration of long-lasting telomerase interactions at telomeres. Our data reveal that telomere elongation in cells expressing cancer-associated POT1 mutants arises from the dual impact of these mutations on telomere accessibility and telomerase retention at telomeres. CoPixie can be used to explore a variety of questions involving macromolecular interactions in living cells, including between proteins and nucleic acids, from multicolor single-particle tracks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".