MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401206838 · doi:10.1093/ehr/ceae122

David Owen, Human Rights and the Remaking of British Foreign Policy, by David Grealy

2024· article· en· W4401206838 on OpenAlexaff
Tom Buchanan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe English Historical Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsKellogg's (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman rightsLaw and economicsHistoryPolitical scienceLawSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

David Owen unexpectedly became Foreign Secretary on the death of Tony Crosland in March 1977, one of the many twists and turns in a career that would see him play a leading role in the Social Democratic Party (SDP) in the 1980s and become an international diplomat in the 1990s. David Grealy has sought to rescue Owen from his sardonic Spitting Image caricature, emphasising instead his principled, meditative character and ability to influence British foreign policy long beyond his relatively short spell at the helm of the Foreign Office. This thoroughly researched and well-written book builds on Grealy’s Ph.D. thesis, and is based on a close reading of Owen’s extensive private papers at the University of Liverpool. The book opens with a fascinating account of Owen’s early life and influences. He was an apolitical medical student who turned to politics after the Suez crisis, joining the Labour party in response to Hugh Gaitskell’s appeal to the ‘armchair socialists’. From the start Owen espoused Christian Socialism and fell under the spell of Mervyn Stockwood at Cambridge. Elected MP for Plymouth Sutton in 1966, Owen was initially a strong supporter of Harold Wilson, but soon turned against what he saw as Wilson’s abandonment of radical, moral policies for ‘hollow managerialism’. (Given that the book chronicles Owen’s own discovery of the virtues of compromise while at the Foreign Office, one hopes that he came to a better appreciation of the problems that Wilson faced in office). In the rapidly changing politics of the late 1960s, Owen came to see a commitment to human rights as the best way for Labour to connect with the new currents of extra-parliamentary activism. Human rights, he later wrote, must be a ‘natural policy for socialists to champion’.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe English Historical ReviewSame topicInternational Law and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207