MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401210485 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2024.3434408

A High-Gain Microstrip RF Energy Harvester for IoT Sensors in 5G Network

2024· article· en· W4401210485 on OpenAlexafffund
Maryam Eshaghi, Rashid Rashidzadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInternet of ThingsMicrostripEnergy harvestingWireless sensor networkRadio frequencyMicrostrip antennaElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringEnergy (signal processing)Computer scienceOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceComputer networkEngineeringPhysicsEmbedded systemAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the implementation of fifth-generation (5G) wireless networks expands, the interest in using radio frequency energy harvesting (RFEH) as a power source for low-power Internet of Things (IoT) devices increases. RFEH has the potential to eliminate the need for batteries, providing a reliable and sustainable power source for these devices. However, the efficiency of RF to dc converters at high frequencies, commonly used in 5G networks, is relatively low. This article proposes a new high-gain RFEH circuit that incorporates a$2 \times 2$patch array antenna, a reflector, and a cascade microstrip L-matching network used as a passive voltage amplifier to increase the induced voltage across the antenna. The RFEH receiver is fabricated on a low-cost FR-4 substrate with a dielectric constant of 4.6 and a copper thickness of 0.035 mm. To enhance efficiency in RF to dc conversion, a novel microstrip voltage amplifier is designed, resulting in an overall gain of 30 dB at an input power of -30 dBm with a 1-M$\Omega $load. This amplifier exclusively utilizes traces on the printed circuit board (PCB), eliminating the need for low-efficiency voltage doublers. A prototype has been fabricated and measured. The results show that the proposed RFEH can capture signals at 5.2 GHz and amplify the induced voltage across the antenna. The efficiency exceeds 70% in the frequency range of 5–5.4 GHz, with a peak efficiency of 74.82% at an input power of -10 dBm and a 10-k$\Omega $load.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207