MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401210870 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0308016

AmiR-P3: An AI-based microRNA prediction pipeline in plants

2024· article· en· W4401210870 on OpenAlexfundno aff
S Ataei, Jafar Ahmadi, Sayed‐Amir Marashi, Ilia Abolhasani

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYork UniversityUniversity of TehranIslamic Azad UniversityUniversity of Missouri
KeywordsComputational biologymicroRNABiologyPipeline (software)GenomeGene predictionTranscriptomeGenomicsDeep sequencingSequence (biology)BioinformaticsGeneticsComputer scienceGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs that play important post-transcriptional regulatory roles in animals and plants. Despite the importance of plant miRNAs, the inherent complexity of miRNA biogenesis in plants hampers the application of standard miRNA prediction tools, which are often optimized for animal sequences. Therefore, computational approaches to predict putative miRNAs (merely) from genomic sequences, regardless of their expression levels or tissue specificity, are of great interest. RESULTS: Here, we present AmiR-P3, a novel ab initio plant miRNA prediction pipeline that leverages the strengths of various utilities for its key computational steps. Users can readily adjust the prediction criteria based on the state-of-the-art biological knowledge of plant miRNA properties. The pipeline starts with finding the potential homologs of the known plant miRNAs in the input sequence(s) and ensures that they do not overlap with protein-coding regions. Then, by computing the secondary structure of the presumed RNA sequence based on the minimum free energy, a deep learning classification model is employed to predict potential pre-miRNA structures. Finally, a set of criteria is used to select the most likely miRNAs from the set of predicted miRNAs. We show that our method yields acceptable predictions in a variety of plant species. CONCLUSION: AmiR-P3 does not (necessarily) require sequencing reads and/or assembled reference genomes, enabling it to identify conserved and novel putative miRNAs from any genomic or transcriptomic sequence. Therefore, AmiR-P3 is suitable for miRNA prediction even in less-studied plants, as it does not require any prior knowledge of the miRNA repertoire of the organism. AmiR-P3 is provided as a docker container, which is a portable and self-contained software package that can be readily installed and run on any platform and is freely available for non-commercial use from: https://hub.docker.com/r/micrornaproject/amir-p3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207