MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401211112 · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad5a7d

An Earth-sized Planet on the Verge of Tidal Disruption

2024· article· en· W4401211112 on OpenAlexaff
Fei Dai, Andrew W. Howard, Samuel Halverson, J. Orell-Miquel, Ε. Πάλλη, Howard Isaacson, Benjamin J. Fulton, Ellen M. Price, Mykhaylo Plotnykov, Leslie A. Rogers, Diana Valencia, Kimberly Paragas, Michael Greklek-McKeon, Jonathan Gomez Barrientos, Heather A. Knutson, Erik A. Petigura, Lauren M. Weiss, Rena A. Lee, Casey L. Brinkman, Daniel Huber, Gumundur Stefánsson, K. Masuda, Steven Giacalone, Cicero X. Lu, Edwin S. Kite, Renyu Hu, Eric Gaidos, Michael Zhang, Ryan A. Rubenzahl, Joshua N. Winn, Te Han, Corey Beard, Rae Holcomb, Aaron Householder, Gregory J. Gilbert, Jack Lubin, J. M. Joel Ong, Alex S. Polanski, Nicholas Saunders, Judah Van Zandt, Samuel W. Yee, Jingwen Zhang, Jon K. Zink, B. Holden, Ashley Baker, Max Brodheim, Ian J. M. Crossfield, William Deich, Jerry Edelstein, Steven R. Gibson, Grant M. Hill, Sharon R. Jelinsky, Marc Kassis, Russ R. Laher, Kyle Lanclos, Scott Lilley, Joel Payne, Kodi Rider, Paul Robertson, Arpita Roy, Christian Schwab, Abby P. Shaum, Martin M. Sirk, Chris Smith, Adam Vandenberg, Josh Walawender, Sharon X. Wang, S. X. Wang, Edward Wishnow, Jason T. Wright, Sherry Yeh, J. A. Caballero, J. C. Morales, F. Murgas, E. Nagel, A. Reiners, A. Schweitzer, H. M. Tabernero, M. Zechmeister, Alton Spencer, David R. Ciardi, Catherine A. Clark, Michael B. Lund, Douglas A. Caldwell, Karen A. Collins, Richard P. Schwarz, Khalid Barkaoui, Cristilyn N. Watkins, Avi Shporer, Norio Narita, Akihiko Fukui, Gregor Srdoč, David W. Latham, Jon M. Jenkins, G. Ricker, Sara Seager, R. Vanderspek

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicScientific Research and Discoveries
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersPrecursory Research for Embryonic Science and TechnologyAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceScience Mission DirectorateAmes Research CenterMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónNASA Exoplanet Science InstituteMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationEuropean Regional Development FundCalifornia Institute of TechnologySpace Telescope Science InstituteW. M. Keck FoundationJet Propulsion LaboratoryNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAstrobiologyPhysicsPlanetEarth (classical element)AstronomySuper-EarthKepler-69cTerrestrial planetExoplanet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract TOI-6255 b (GJ 4256) is an Earth-sized planet (1.079 ± 0.065 R ⊕) with an orbital period of only 5.7 hr. With the newly commissioned Keck Planet Finder and CARMENES spectrographs, we determine the planet’s mass to be 1.44 ± 0.14 M ⊕. The planet is just outside the Roche limit, with P orb/P Roche = 1.13 ± 0.10. The strong tidal force likely deforms the planet into a triaxial ellipsoid with a long axis that is ∼10% longer than the short axis. Assuming a reduced stellar tidal quality factor Q ⋆ ′ ≈ 10 7 , we predict that tidal orbital decay will cause TOI-6255 to reach the Roche limit in roughly 400 Myr. Such tidal disruptions may produce the possible signatures of planet engulfment that have been seen on stars with anomalously high refractory elemental abundances compared to their conatal binary companions. TOI-6255 b is also a favorable target for searching for star–planet magnetic interactions, which might cause interior melting and hasten orbital decay. TOI-6255 b is a top target (with an Emission Spectroscopy Metric of about 24) for phase-curve observations with the James Webb Space Telescope.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicScientific Research and DiscoveriesFrench-language works237,207