Remaining useful life prognostic-based energy management strategy for multi-fuel cell stack systems in automotive applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To achieve the 8000-h proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack (PEM FCS) life target set by the U.S DoE and promote fuel cell hybrid electric vehicles (FCHEVs) massive introduction in the automotive market, using multi-fuel cell stack (MFCS) systems instead of single-fuel cell stack systems seems to be an interesting solution that deserves to be explored. MFCS systems' concept combines several small FCSs modules instead of using a single high-powered FCS module. The modularity in such systems can be exploited through energy management to improve their durability and extend their good energy-efficiency power range. However, FCSs' multiplicity makes it challenging to implement effective energy management strategies (EMSs). This paper proposes a remaining useful life (RUL) prognostic-based EMS to extend MFCS systems' lifetime while keeping their hydrogen consumption reasonable. For this purpose, a prognostic algorithm is developed to predict PEM FCSs' RUL in real-world automotive application scenarios. Then a rule-based EMS allocates the demand between stacks using prognostic results. The proposed strategy's performance is evaluated on a hybrid MFCS/battery system using Matlab/Simulink's environment. Simulation results show that implementing the proposed strategy instead of conventional EMSs can extend MFCS systems' lifetime by at least a factor of 2.35 while keeping their hydrogen consumption reasonable. © 2001 Elsevier Science. All rights reserved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".