MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401211649 · doi:10.3390/app14156712

Violence-YOLO: Enhanced GELAN Algorithm for Violence Detection

2024· article· en· W4401211649 on OpenAlexaff
Wenbin Xu, Dingju Zhu, Renfeng Deng, Kai Leung Yung, W.H. Ip

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Violence is a serious threat to societal health; preventing violence in airports, airplanes, and spacecraft is crucial. This study proposes the Violence-YOLO model to detect violence accurately in real time in complex environments, enhancing public safety. The model is based on YOLOv9’s Generalized Efficient Layer Aggregation Network (GELAN-C). A multilayer SimAM is incorporated into GELAN’s neck to identify attention regions in the scene. YOLOv9 modules are combined with RepGhostNet and GhostNet. Two modules, RepNCSPELAN4_GB and RepNCSPELAN4_RGB, are innovatively proposed and introduced. The shallow convolution in the backbone is replaced with GhostConv, reducing computational complexity. Additionally, an ultra-lightweight upsampler, Dysample, is introduced to enhance performance and reduce overhead. Finally, Focaler-IoU addresses the neglect of simple and difficult samples, improving training accuracy. The datasets are derived from RWF-2000 and Hockey. Experimental results show that Violence-YOLO outperforms GELAN-C. mAP@0.5 increases by 0.9%, computational load decreases by 12.3%, and model size is reduced by 12.4%, which is significant for embedded hardware such as the Raspberry Pi. Violence-YOLO can be deployed to monitor public places such as airports, effectively handling complex backgrounds and ensuring accurate and fast detection of violent behavior. In addition, we achieved 84.4% mAP on the Pascal VOC dataset, which is a significant reduction in model parameters compared to the previously refined detector. This study offers insights for real-time detection of violent behaviors in public environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207