MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401214188 · doi:10.1101/2024.07.30.24311224

AI-based volumetric six-tissue body composition quantification from CT cardiac attenuation scans enhances mortality prediction: multicenter study

2024· preprint· en· W4401214188 on OpenAlexaff
Jirong Yi, Anna M. Michałowska, Aakash Shanbhag, Robert J.H. Miller, Jolien Geers, Wenhao Zhang, Aditya Killekar, Nipun Manral, Mark Lemley, Mikołaj Buchwald, Jacek Kwieciński, Jianhang Zhou, Paul Kavanagh, Joanna X. Liang, Valerie Builoff, Terrence D. Ruddy, Andrew J. Einstein, Attila Fehér, Edward J. Miller, Albert J. Sinusas, Daniel S. Berman, Damini Dey, Piotr J. Slomka

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsAttenuationRisk stratificationCorrection for attenuationComputed tomographyPerfusionNuclear medicineMedicineMyocardial perfusion imagingRadiologyInternal medicinePositron emission tomographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Computed tomography attenuation correction (CTAC) scans are routinely obtained during cardiac perfusion imaging, but currently only utilized for attenuation correction and visual calcium estimation. We aimed to develop a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach to obtain volumetric measurements of chest body composition from CTAC scans and evaluate these measures for all-cause mortality (ACM) risk stratification. Methods We applied AI-based segmentation and image-processing techniques on CTAC scans from a large international image-based registry (four sites), to define chest rib cage and multiple tissues. Volumetric measures of bone, skeletal muscle (SM), subcutaneous, intramuscular (IMAT), visceral (VAT), and epicardial (EAT) adipose tissues were quantified between automatically-identified T5 and T11 vertebrae. The independent prognostic value of volumetric attenuation, and indexed volumes were evaluated for predicting ACM, adjusting for established risk factors and 18 other body compositions measures via Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves. Findings End-to-end processing time was <2 minutes/scan with no user interaction. Of 9918 patients studied, 5451(55%) were male. During median 2.5 years follow-up, 610 (6.2%) patients died. High VAT, EAT and IMAT attenuation were associated with increased ACM risk (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval] for VAT: 2.39 [1.92, 2.96], p<0.0001; EAT: 1.55 [1.26, 1.90], p<0.0001; IMAT: 1.30 [1.06, 1.60], p=0.0124). Patients with high bone attenuation were at lower risk of death as compared to subjects with lower bone attenuation (adjusted HR 0.77 [0.62, 0.95], p=0.0159). Likewise, high SM volume index was associated with a lower risk of death (adjusted HR 0.56 [0.44, 0.71], p<0.0001). Interpretations CTAC scans obtained routinely during cardiac perfusion imaging contain important volumetric body composition biomarkers which can be automatically measured and offer important additional prognostic value. Research in context Evidence before this study Fully automated volumetric body composition analysis of chest computed tomography attenuation correction (CTAC) can be obtained in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging. This new information has potential to significantly improve risk stratification and patient management. However, the CTAC scans have not been utilized for body composition analysis to date. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for existing body composition related literature on June 5, 2024, using the search term (“mortality”) AND (“risk stratification” OR “survival analysis” OR “prognostic prediction” OR “prognosis”) AND (“body composition quantification” OR “body composition analysis” OR “body composition segmentation”). We identified 34 articles either exploring body composition segmentation or evaluating clinical value of body composition quantification. However, to date, all the prognostic evaluation is performed for quantification of three or fewer types of body composition tissues. Within the prognostic studies, only one used chest CT scans but utilized only a few specified slices selected from the scans, and not a standardized volumetric analysis. None of these previous efforts utilized CTAC scans, and none included epicardial adipose tissue in comprehensive body composition analysis. Added value of this study In this international multi-center study, we demonstrate a novel artificial intelligence-based annotation-free approach for segmenting six key body composition tissues (bone, skeletal muscle, subcutaneous adipose tissue, intramuscular adipose tissue, epicardial adipose tissue, and visceral adipose tissue) from low-dose ungated CTAC scans, by exploiting existing CT segmentation models and image processing techniques. We evaluate the prognostic value of metrics derived from volumetric quantification of CTAC scans obtained during cardiac imaging, for all-cause mortality prediction in a large cohort of patients. We reveal strong and independent associations between several volumetric body composition metrics and all-cause mortality after adjusting for existing clinical factors, and available cardiac perfusion and atherosclerosis biomarkers. Implications of all the available evidence The comprehensive body composition analysis can be routinely performed, at the point of care, for all cardiac perfusion scans utilizing CTAC. Automatically-obtained volumetric body composition quantification metrics provide added value over existing risk factors, using already-obtained scans to significantly improve the risk stratification of patients and clinical decision-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityFrench-language works237,207