AI-based volumetric six-tissue body composition quantification from CT cardiac attenuation scans enhances mortality prediction: multicenter study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Computed tomography attenuation correction (CTAC) scans are routinely obtained during cardiac perfusion imaging, but currently only utilized for attenuation correction and visual calcium estimation. We aimed to develop a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach to obtain volumetric measurements of chest body composition from CTAC scans and evaluate these measures for all-cause mortality (ACM) risk stratification. Methods We applied AI-based segmentation and image-processing techniques on CTAC scans from a large international image-based registry (four sites), to define chest rib cage and multiple tissues. Volumetric measures of bone, skeletal muscle (SM), subcutaneous, intramuscular (IMAT), visceral (VAT), and epicardial (EAT) adipose tissues were quantified between automatically-identified T5 and T11 vertebrae. The independent prognostic value of volumetric attenuation, and indexed volumes were evaluated for predicting ACM, adjusting for established risk factors and 18 other body compositions measures via Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves. Findings End-to-end processing time was <2 minutes/scan with no user interaction. Of 9918 patients studied, 5451(55%) were male. During median 2.5 years follow-up, 610 (6.2%) patients died. High VAT, EAT and IMAT attenuation were associated with increased ACM risk (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval] for VAT: 2.39 [1.92, 2.96], p<0.0001; EAT: 1.55 [1.26, 1.90], p<0.0001; IMAT: 1.30 [1.06, 1.60], p=0.0124). Patients with high bone attenuation were at lower risk of death as compared to subjects with lower bone attenuation (adjusted HR 0.77 [0.62, 0.95], p=0.0159). Likewise, high SM volume index was associated with a lower risk of death (adjusted HR 0.56 [0.44, 0.71], p<0.0001). Interpretations CTAC scans obtained routinely during cardiac perfusion imaging contain important volumetric body composition biomarkers which can be automatically measured and offer important additional prognostic value. Research in context Evidence before this study Fully automated volumetric body composition analysis of chest computed tomography attenuation correction (CTAC) can be obtained in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging. This new information has potential to significantly improve risk stratification and patient management. However, the CTAC scans have not been utilized for body composition analysis to date. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for existing body composition related literature on June 5, 2024, using the search term (“mortality”) AND (“risk stratification” OR “survival analysis” OR “prognostic prediction” OR “prognosis”) AND (“body composition quantification” OR “body composition analysis” OR “body composition segmentation”). We identified 34 articles either exploring body composition segmentation or evaluating clinical value of body composition quantification. However, to date, all the prognostic evaluation is performed for quantification of three or fewer types of body composition tissues. Within the prognostic studies, only one used chest CT scans but utilized only a few specified slices selected from the scans, and not a standardized volumetric analysis. None of these previous efforts utilized CTAC scans, and none included epicardial adipose tissue in comprehensive body composition analysis. Added value of this study In this international multi-center study, we demonstrate a novel artificial intelligence-based annotation-free approach for segmenting six key body composition tissues (bone, skeletal muscle, subcutaneous adipose tissue, intramuscular adipose tissue, epicardial adipose tissue, and visceral adipose tissue) from low-dose ungated CTAC scans, by exploiting existing CT segmentation models and image processing techniques. We evaluate the prognostic value of metrics derived from volumetric quantification of CTAC scans obtained during cardiac imaging, for all-cause mortality prediction in a large cohort of patients. We reveal strong and independent associations between several volumetric body composition metrics and all-cause mortality after adjusting for existing clinical factors, and available cardiac perfusion and atherosclerosis biomarkers. Implications of all the available evidence The comprehensive body composition analysis can be routinely performed, at the point of care, for all cardiac perfusion scans utilizing CTAC. Automatically-obtained volumetric body composition quantification metrics provide added value over existing risk factors, using already-obtained scans to significantly improve the risk stratification of patients and clinical decision-making.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".