Hybrid fragment-SMILES tokenization for ADMET prediction in drug discovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Drug discovery and development is the extremely costly and time-consuming process of identifying new molecules that can interact with a biomarker target to interrupt the disease pathway of interest. In addition to binding the target, a drug candidate needs to satisfy multiple properties affecting absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET). Artificial intelligence approaches provide an opportunity to improve each step of the drug discovery and development process, in which the first question faced by us is how a molecule can be informatively represented such that the in-silico solutions are optimized. RESULTS: This study introduces a novel hybrid SMILES-fragment tokenization method, coupled with two pre-training strategies, utilizing a Transformer-based model. We investigate the efficacy of hybrid tokenization in improving the performance of ADMET prediction tasks. Our approach leverages MTL-BERT, an encoder-only Transformer model that achieves state-of-the-art ADMET predictions, and contrasts the standard SMILES tokenization with our hybrid method across a spectrum of fragment library cutoffs. CONCLUSION: The findings reveal that while an excess of fragments can impede performance, using hybrid tokenization with high frequency fragments enhances results beyond the base SMILES tokenization. This advancement underscores the potential of integrating fragment- and character-level molecular features within the training of Transformer models for ADMET property prediction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".