Coping Strategies In Overcoming Academic Stress Among High School Students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Academic stress is a problem often faced by high school students, it can affect their mental well-being and academic performance. Coping strategies play an important role in helping students deal with such stress. This study aims to explore various coping strategies used by high school students in dealing with academic stress and its impact on their mental well-being. This research uses a qualitative approach. Data were analyzed using the thematic analysis method to identify patterns of coping strategies used. The results of this study indicate that high school students use various coping strategies to deal with academic stress, such as social support from peers, exercise, and relaxation techniques such as meditation. Students also use problem-solving and cognitive restructuring strategies to change their perceptions of academic stressor situations. The conclusion of this research is that the coping strategies used by high school students play a very important role in helping them overcome academic stress and improve mental well-being. The importance of providing approaches in managing academic stress among students to promote their mental health. This research provides valuable insights for educators and counselors to develop appropriate interventions to support students to deal with academic stress more effectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".