MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401236302 · doi:10.55849/solj.v2i2.1148

The Role of Planning in Management: Strategies to Achieve Organizational Success

2024· article· en· W4401236302 on OpenAlexaff
Koppel Tavo, Romann Rasmus

Bibliographic record

VenueSharia Oikonomia Law Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInformation Technology Governance and Strategy
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStrategic planningProcess managementPlan (archaeology)Context (archaeology)Knowledge managementStrategic human resource planningBusinessFoundation (evidence)Management scienceComputer sciencePolitical scienceEngineeringMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article aims to outline the importance of planning in the context of organizational management. Planning, both strategically and operationally, is explained as a crucial foundation for achieving organizational goals. The data collection method used is the literature method, which is used to trace historical and theoretical data related to planning in management. Strategic planning, as a comprehensive long-term plan, is considered the foundation for operational planning in achieving organizational goals. Three main reasons why strategic planning is important: first, as a basic framework for all types of planning; second, it facilitates the understanding of other planning; Third, as a starting point for evaluating managerial and organizational activities as a whole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.025
Scholarly communication0.0190.014
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSharia Oikonomia Law JournalSame topicInformation Technology Governance and StrategyFrench-language works237,207