MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401241666 · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ad6ace

Boundary-aware semantic clustering network for segmentation of prostate zones from T2-weighted MRI

2024· article· en· W4401241666 on OpenAlexaff
Weixuan Kou, Harry Marshall, Bernard Chiu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityWestern University
FundersCity University of Hong Kong
KeywordsSegmentationPattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceGround truthBoundary (topology)Feature (linguistics)Similarity (geometry)Cluster analysisGeneralizability theoryMathematicsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective. Automatic segmentation of prostatic zones from MRI can improve clinical diagnosis of prostate cancer as lesions in the peripheral zone (PZ) and central gland (CG) exhibit different characteristics. Existing approaches are limited in their accuracy in localizing the edges of PZ and CG. The proposed boundary-aware semantic clustering network (BASC-Net) improves segmentation performance by learning features in the vicinity of the prostate zonal boundaries, instead of only focusing on manually segmented boundaries. Approach. BASC-Net consists of two major components: the semantic clustering attention (SCA) module and the boundary-aware contrastive (BAC) loss. The SCA module implements a self-attention mechanism that extracts feature bases representing essential features of the inner body and boundary subregions and constructs attention maps highlighting each subregion. SCA is the first self-attention algorithm that utilizes ground truth masks to supervise the feature basis construction process. The features extracted from the inner body and boundary subregions of the same zone were integrated by BAC loss, which promotes the similarity of features extracted in the two subregions of the same zone. The BAC loss further promotes the difference between features extracted from different zones. Main results. BASC-Net was evaluated on the NCI-ISBI 2013 Challenge and Prostate158 datasets. An inter-dataset evaluation was conducted to evaluate the generalizability of the proposed method. BASC-Net outperformed nine state-of-the-art methods in all three experimental settings, attaining Dice similarity coefficients of 79.9% and 88.6% for PZ and CG, respectively, in the NCI-ISBI dataset, 80.5% and 89.2% for PZ and CG, respectively, in Prostate158 dataset, and 73.2% and 87.4% for PZ and CG, respectively, in the inter-dataset evaluation. Significance. As prostate lesions in PZ and CG have different characteristics, the zonal boundaries segmented by BASC-Net will facilitate prostate lesion detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and Biology→Same topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→