MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Secuelas neurológicas post- COVID 19 y su influencia sobre la salud mental en América Latina

2024· article· es· W4401244606 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jocelyne Elizabeth Fuentes Parrales, Pabel Joao Guerrero- Plúas, Bryan Didier Rodríguez-Ávila

Bibliographic record

VenueMQRInvestigar · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La pandemia de COVID-19, originada por la variante mutante SARS-CoV-2, se detectó inicialmente en China. Este virus es muy contagioso y se propaga rápidamente entre las personas a través de la tos, las secreciones respiratorias y el contacto cercano. Causando secuelas que pueden afectar a la salud mental es por ello que el objetivo de esta investigación es determinar las secuelas neurológicas post- COVID 19 y su influencia sobre la salud mental en América Latina. Se utilizó un diseño documental de tipo descriptivo bibliográfico, se empleó el uso de operadores booleanos y términos MeSH para una correcta búsqueda de las bases de datos tales como PubMed, Scielo, Redalyc, entre otras, aplicando el uso correcto de las normas Vancouver. Los resultados obtenidos demuestran que las secuelas neurológicas incluyen accidente cerebrovascular (47.6%) en Argentina, niebla cerebral (81%) en Brasil y en El Salvador con 73.9% el síndrome de Guillain-Barré. Las secuelas más comunes son cefalea, accidentes cerebrovasculares, convulsiones y encefalopatía, con síntomas como náuseas, vómitos, mareos, ataxia, fiebre, tos y fatiga. En América latina la principal secuela es la encefalopatía, vinculada a trastornos del movimiento y delirium y alteraciones cognitivas asociadas con depresión, ansiedad, insomnio y angustia. En conclusión, en América latinas las secuelas neurológicas influyen en la aparición de posibles trastornos mentales que pueden afectar la salud de la población.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0170.020
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMQRInvestigarSame topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19French-language works237,207