MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401244789 · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2024.07.066

Optimization of automated garbage recognition model based on ResNet-50 and weakly supervised CNN for sustainable urban development

2024· article· en· W4401244789 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlexandria Engineering Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire Detection and Safety Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGarbageSustainable developmentComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceResidual neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)Development (topology)Environmental scienceAgricultural engineeringMachine learningMathematicsEngineeringDeep learningBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the context of sustainable urban development, effective garbage management plays a crucial role. However, traditional methods encounter limitations in terms of data quality and quantity. The research on automatic garbage image recognition and classification methods based on deep learning has been gaining attention. This study proposes an integrated garbage image recognition and classification method that combines ResNet-50, YOLOv5, and weakly supervised CNN algorithms. The aim is to enhance both the accuracy and efficiency of image recognition, optimize intelligent garbage management, and promote urban sustainable development planning. The ResNet-50 model is employed to extract meaningful features from images and train weakly supervised CNN models for subsequent training and prediction. This enables the analysis of urban environmental development trends and the formulation of planning measures. Through evaluation on four representative public datasets, the proposed method outperforms several traditional algorithms in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and stability in garbage image recognition systems. Notably, on the HGI-30 dataset, the algorithm achieves significant improvements by reducing inference time by over 48.6%, FLOPs by over 46.5%, and MAPE by over 41%. These enhancements greatly enhance the accuracy and robustness of garbage image classification, highlighting the substantial significance of this method in the realms of garbage management and environmental protection. • We integrate different deep learning algorithms to enhance the accuracy and efficiency. • Integration of IoT and communication technologies optimizes the intelligent garbage management. • The method holds significance for waste management and sustainable urban development planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it