Tear α‐synuclein as a biomarker for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease symptoms mostly manifest after significant and irreversible neuropathology. Hence, there is a need to identify biomarkers that can provide indications of disease before significant neuronal degeneration occurs. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the difference in the concentration of α-synuclein protein in tears between individuals with Parkinson's disease and healthy controls. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The last database search was on December 20, 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Primary prospective studies in humans measuring the level of α-synuclein in tears and clinical outcomes reported using mean or median. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Individuals with Parkinson's disease and healthy controls. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The I2 statistic was used to estimate heterogeneity. The outcome measure was the difference in tear total and oligomeric α-synuclein. Mean difference (MD) was used to assess the outcome. The certainty of evidence was rated following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment and Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-seven Parkinson's disease and 312 healthy control subjects from five studies and 177 Parkinson's disease and 166 healthy control subjects from two studies were included in total α-synuclein levels and oligomeric α-synuclein levels analysis, respectively. Total α-synuclein level was not different between Parkinson's disease and healthy controls (MD = 0.02 ng/mL [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.00 to 0.05 ng/mL; I2 = 90%; Z = 1.79; p=0.07; number of studies = 5; GRADE rating = very low]). Stratifying the data based on disease duration, total α-synuclein was higher in subjects with Parkinson's disease duration ≥7 years compared with healthy controls (MD = 0.04 ng/mL [95% CI: 0.03 to 0.05 ng/mL; I2 = 0%; Z = 8.24, p<0.00001; number of studies = 2; GRADE rating = low]) but not different between the two groups (MD = -0.12 ng/mL (95% CI: -0.38 to 0.15 ng/mL; I2 = 93%; Z = 0.84, p=0.40; number of studies = 3; GRADE rating = very low]). Oligomeric α-synuclein level was higher in Parkinson's disease compared with controls (MD = 6.50 ng/mL [95% CI: 2.79 to 10.20 ng/mL; I2 = 94%; Z = 3.44; p=0.0006; number of studies = 2; GRADE rating = very low]). LIMITATIONS: High heterogeneity between studies. Potential sources of heterogeneity could not be explored due to the limited number of studies. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: Tear α-synuclein has the potential to be a noninvasive biomarker for Parkinson's disease. Studies are, however, needed to increase certainty in the biomarker and establish how the protein's changes in tears correlate with Parkinson's disease progression and severity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".