MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401245828 · doi:10.70121/001c.121718

Changes in the Brain During Menopause: A Comprehensive Review

2024· review· en· W4401245828 on OpenAlexaff
Youlan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarly review . · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMenopausePsychologyGerontologyMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Menopause is a natural physiological transition marked by fluctuations in hormone levels in the body, resulting from a decline in ovarian function and eventual ovulation cessation, not a complete halt in ovarian production, which is closely tied to menstruation (World Health Organization, 2022). Not only is it a physiological change, but it’s also considered a neurological change, as indicated by key symptoms that appear, such as cognitive decline, sleep disturbances, and altered mood (Thomas, 2021). These symptoms are all related to lobes and regions in the brain. In previous years, there has been various in-depth scientific research into menopause and changes in the brain, which has provided valuable insights for this review article. The objective of this paper is to explore the relationship between menopause and neurological changes, emphasizing the impact of hormonal fluctuations on cognitive decline, sleep disturbances, and mood alterations, and providing a foundation for holistic interventions that prioritize women’s well-being during this natural life transition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarly review .Same topicCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesFrench-language works237,207