MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401248885 · doi:10.1080/24745332.2024.2373747

Acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) presentations with and without pneumonia: To lump or split, that is the question

2024· article· en· W4401248885 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mathieu Saint-Pierre, Simon Couillard

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Respiratory Critical Care and Sleep Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeInstitut du Savoir MontfortMontfort HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Lung AssociationGrifolsCovis PharmaRegeneron PharmaceuticalsSanofiGlaxoSmithKlineAstraZenecaFonds de recherche du QuébecPfizer
KeywordsPulmonary diseaseCOPDMedicinePneumoniaIntensive care medicineDiseaseChronic pneumoniaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are a leading cause of hospitalization in Canada, second only to childbirth, with recent data indicating an upward trend in adm...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.048
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.048
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.019
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0060.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Respiratory Critical Care and Sleep MedicineSame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207