MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401252649 · doi:10.3233/kca-240005

Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Advanced/Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Cabozantinib or Other Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors After Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based Therapy

2024· article· en· W4401252649 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Yick Chin Heng, Gurjyot K. Doshi, Pascale Dutailly, Aude Houchard, Mickael Löthgren, Alisha Monnette, Yunfei Wang, Valérie Perrot, Aly‐Khan A. Lalani

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney Cancer · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Calgary
FundersIpsen
KeywordsCabozantinibRenal cell carcinomaMedicineTyrosine-kinase inhibitorTyrosine kinaseOncologyInternal medicineCancer researchCancerReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-based therapy is recommended for first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Cabozantinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved in the USA for treating mRCC, including after CPI-based therapy. However, data on the benefits of subsequent TKI therapy are limited. OBJECTIVE: To study the real-world use and outcomes of cabozantinib versus other TKIs after CPI-based therapy for mRCC. METHODS: This retrospective study used data from the US Oncology Network electronic health record database supplemented by chart review. Patients initiated TKI therapy between 2016 and 2021 after CPI-based therapy. The primary endpoint was real-world response rate in the first 6 months of treatment (RR-6m; physician assessment). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Covariates were adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: Of 485 included patients, 331 received cabozantinib and 154 another TKI. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between arms. For cabozantinib versus other TKIs, adjusted RR-6m (available for 69.3% of patients) was 62.5% versus 46.0% (rate difference: superiority, 16.5% [95% CI: 7.8–25.1], p = 0.0002), adjusted ORR was 62.4% versus 49.4% ( p = 0.0020), adjusted median OS was 19.2 versus 19.1 months ( p = 0.7353) and adjusted median PFS was 7.9 versus 9.2 months ( p = 0.8752). CONCLUSIONS: Cabozantinib following CPI-based therapy was effective for treating mRCC in the US real-world setting. Differences in adjusted RR-6m and ORR significantly favored cabozantinib versus other TKIs. The lack of OS difference may reflect differences in post-index therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney CancerSame topicRenal cell carcinoma treatmentFrench-language works237,207