MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401253729 · doi:10.1080/09687599.2024.2385919

15-minute cities, ‘walkability’ and last millimeter problems

2024· article· en· W4401253729 on OpenAlexaff
Ron Buliung

Bibliographic record

VenueDisability & Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWalkabilityResidenceDisabled peopleCentral cityService (business)Architectural engineeringBuilt environmentSociologyGerontologyTransport engineeringBusinessPsychologyApplied psychologyRegional scienceMedicineCivil engineeringEngineeringMarketingDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 15-minute city concept is about planning and building cities so that most essential activities can be accessed within 15-minutes of a residence on foot or by bicycle.The possibilities and limitations of the concept for disabled persons have yet to be fully considered.Here I centre disability in a hopeful critique of concepts central to 15-minute city implementation.I argue that greater attention should be given to what I call last millimeter problems, barriers within small spaces (e.g.subway platform gaps) disabled persons face in transportation systems and the built environment that can make any city, including a 15-minute city, an impassable city.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDisability & SocietySame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207