Advances in MRI‐based diagnosis of temporal lobe epilepsy: Correlating hippocampal subfield volumes with histopathology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Epilepsy, affecting 0.5%-1% of the global population, presents a significant challenge with 30% of patients resistant to medical treatment. Temporal lobe epilepsy, a common cause of medically refractory epilepsy, is often caused by hippocampal sclerosis (HS). HS can be divided further by subtype, as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE). Type 1 HS, the most prevalent form (60%-80% of all cases), is characterized by cell loss and gliosis predominantly in the subfields cornu ammonis (CA1) and CA4. Type 2 HS features cell loss and gliosis primarily in the CA1 sector, and type 3 HS features cell loss and gliosis predominantly in the CA4 subfield. This literature review evaluates studies on hippocampal subfields, exploring whether observable atrophy patterns from in vivo and ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans correlate with histopathological examinations with manual or automated segmentation techniques. Our findings suggest only ex vivo 1.5 Tesla (T) or 3T MRI with manual segmentation or in vivo 7T MRI with manual or automated segmentations can consistently correlate subfield patterns with histopathologically derived ILAE-HS subtypes. In conclusion, manual and automated segmentation methods offer advantages and limitations in diagnosing ILAE-HS subtypes, with ongoing research crucial for refining hippocampal subfield segmentation techniques and enhancing clinical applicability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".