Filling the Gaps in Peptide Maps with a Platform Assay for Top-Down Characterization of Purified Protein Samples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
LC-MS intact mass analysis and LC-MS/MS peptide mapping are foundational assays for developing biologic drugs and other commercial protein products. Certain PTM types, such as truncation and oxidation, increase the difficulty of precise proteoform characterization owing to inherent limitations in peptide and intact protein analyses. Top-down MS (TDMS) can resolve this ambiguity via fragmentation of specific proteoforms. We optimized our existing flow-programmed denaturing online buffer exchange ((fp)dOBE) approach to improve ESI sensitivity and increase TDMS sampling time for industrial applications. Using bovine alpha-lactalbumin (αLac), we tested data-dependent (DDA) and targeted strategies with 14 different MS/MS scan types featuring combinations of collisional- and electron-based fragmentation as well as proton transfer charge reduction. This large dataset was processed using a new software platform, named TDAcquireX, that improves proteoform characterization through TDMS data aggregation. (fp)dOBE-based DDA-TDMS analysis readily identified truncated proteoforms. For targeted TDMS, we used Sliding Window fragment ion deconvolution to analyze composite proteoform (cPrSM) results. This strategy facilitates probability-based noise filtering of individual fragments, simultaneously increasing matched fragments while decreasing total fragment masses. Using this strategy, we characterized oxidation positional isomers on αLac, finding ETD fragmentation uniquely provided accurate relative occupancy ratios by oxidation-specific challenges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".