MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401281098 · doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100714

Calcified carotid artery atheroma on standard dental radiographs: A public health opportunity for cardiovascular risk reduction

2024· article· en· W4401281098 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteCanadian Cardiovascular Society
KeywordsAtheromaMedicineCarotid arteriesReduction (mathematics)RadiographyCardiologyCoronary artery calciumInternal medicineDentistryRadiologyCoronary artery disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Calcified carotid artery atheroma (CCAA) can be identified incidentally on standard dental panoramic radiographs (DPRs). We sought to (1) determine the prevalence of CCAA on DPRs in a general dental population and (2) establish the proportion of patients in whom this would represent a new statin-indicated condition. Methods: We identified patients aged ≥30 with DPRs from 2019 to 2021 from the University of British Columbia Dental Clinic. Patient charts were reviewed for use of lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) and existing statin-indicated conditions. DPRs for each patient were evaluated for the presence and characteristics of CCAA. Results: Of 921 patients with a DPR and documented medical history, 548 (59.5 %) were diagnostic for evaluation of CCAA. Although 116/548 (21.2 %) of these patients had evidence of CCAA, only 25.9 % (30/116) were already on LLT; another 20.7 % (24/116) of patients with CCAA had a pre-existing statin-indicated condition but were not on LLT. Therefore, in 53.4 % (62/116) of patients with CCAA-positive DPRs, this constituted a new diagnosis of atherosclerosis not yet treated with LLT, representing 6.7 % (62/921) of the clinic population and 11.3 % of individuals with DPRs of diagnostic quality (62/548). Dyslipidemia, hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, stroke/transient ischemic attack, older age, and male sex were all found to be significant predictors of CCAA. Conclusion: CCAA is a common finding among patients with DPRs and in over half of cases, the presence of CCAA represents a new diagnosis of atherosclerosis. The high prevalence of new, untreated atherosclerosis in this population indicates an opportunity for risk factor modification and collaboration between dentists and physicians to optimize patient care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.874

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it