Assessing the impacts of temperature extremes on agriculture yield and projecting future extremes using machine learning and deep learning approaches with CMIP6 data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Climate change, particularly extreme weather events, has significantly affected various sectors, including agriculture, human health, water resources, sea levels, and ecosystems. It is anticipated that the intensity, duration, and frequency of these extremes will escalate in the future. This study aims to discover the association between temperature extremes and agricultural yield and to project these extremes using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models with CMIP6 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6) data under two SSPs (Shared Socioeconomic Pathways). A bi-wavelet coherence technique is employed to investigate the association, providing detailed information in both the frequency and time domains for the period of 1980–2014. Various ML and DL models are trained and tested for the periods of 1985–2004 and 2005–2014, respectively, with gradient boosting machine chosen for projecting temperature extremes based on its superior performance. Mann-Kendall test is used for trend analysis in the projected temperature extremes. The results indicate strong negative and positive associations between TN10p (Cold nights) and TN90p (Warm nights), respectively, with wheat production. Additionally, there is a long-term negative association of CSDI (Cold Spell Duration Indicator) and strong positive association of WSDI (Warm Spell Duration Indicator) with rice yield. Projected results show an increase and decrease under SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5, respectively, in DTR (Diurnal Temperature Range) at most stations. TN10p will increase in the future at most stations, with exceptions such as Muree station where it decreases during 2025–2049 and then increases under both SSPs. Projections show that TXn (annual or monthly minimum value of daily maximum temp) will increase in the future, with Muree station exhibiting the lowest value close to zero, while the average maximum value is around 20 °C at Khanpur station. Trend analysis reveals significantly increasing trend in TR20 (Tropical nights) and decreasing trend in CSDI in future durations under both SSPs. These findings hold implications for policymakers and stakeholders in various departments, including agriculture, health, and water resources management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".