MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401285761 · doi:10.18260/1-2--46935

Board 352: Preparing Mechanical Engineering Students for Industry 4.0: an Internet of Things Course

2024· article· en· W4401285761 on OpenAlexaff
Hakan Gürocak, Xinghui Zhao, Kristin Lesseig

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAgile software developmentPaceInternet of ThingsThe InternetProcess (computing)CurriculumEngineering managementIndustry 4.0EngineeringBig dataScale (ratio)Computer scienceAutomotive industryCourse (navigation)Systems engineeringSoftware engineeringWorld Wide WebEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smart products can sense their environment, analyze lots of data (big data), and connect to the Internet to allow exchanging data.These capabilities are known as the Internet of Things (IoT) technologies.As they become ubiquitous, smart products provide enormous opportunities for scientists and engineers to invent new products and influence interconnected systems of vast scale.Mechanical engineers will play a significant role in innovating and designing smart products and manufacturing systems of the Industry 4.0 revolution.However, the current mechanical engineering curriculum has not kept pace.In this paper, we present details of a new IoT course for mechanical engineering students.The course contains active learning and project-based learning components.Specifically, a smart flower pot device was integrated into the lectures of the course as an active learning platform.In addition, the course incorporates team projects involving design of smart products.The agile method, often used in software development companies, is introduced to the mechanical engineering students to manage their project development process.The paper concludes with assessment details from the first offering of the new course.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesFrench-language works237,207