MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401285842 · doi:10.18260/1-2--47031

Board 44: CampNav: A System for Inside Buildings and Campus Navigation

2024· article· en· W4401285842 on OpenAlexaff
Jiping Li, Hamid Timorabadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArchitectural engineeringAeronauticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Finding classrooms can often be a time-consuming task.To address this issue, we introduce CampNav, a comprehensive system featuring an Android mobile application displaying 3D visualizations of campus buildings' indoor floor maps.CampNav includes a comprehensive set of tools for automated data collection and processing.Allowing users to integrate new buildings maps into the application efficiently, reducing time and manpower.This application is built on Mapbox, a widely-used, semi-open source mapping API renowned for its lightweight and versatile mapping capabilities.We have enhanced its functionality to support 3D indoor display.A significant aspect of the system is the utilization and integration of CNNLoc, a neural network designed for Wi-Fi-based positioning.The initial testing of CampNav has received positive responses by students and faculty members, showcasing its user-friendly interface and effective navigational capabilities.The Surveys and the Net Promoter Score (NPS), indicates students' strong affinity for this software, with many expressing a willingness to recommend CampNav to their colleagues.The satisfaction rate in terms of time savings is 93% that emphasizes the importance of CampNav.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic3D Modeling in Geospatial ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207