A home-based hand rehabilitation platform for hemiplegic patients after stroke: A feasibility study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Patients with stroke often experience weakened upper limbs, making daily tasks difficult to perform. Although rehabilitation devices are available, patients often relapse post-discharge due to insufficient practice. We present a home-based hand telerehabilitation intervention using the iManus™ platform comprising a sensorized glove, a mobile app for the patients, and a therapist portal for monitoring patient progress. Objectives: This research aimed to examine the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of a home-based telerehabilitation intervention in improving hand function for individuals with mild stroke. A qualitative approach was also used to explore users' experiences, perceived benefits, and challenges associated with using the platform in a home setting. Methods: In this single-case study, we delivered a hand telerehabilitation intervention to a chronic stroke patient with impaired hand function using the iManus™ platform. The intervention consisted of 40 home sessions over eight weeks. We assessed feasibility through user adherence and feedback obtained using a System Usability Scale (SUS) and a semi-structured interview with the participant and their informal caregiver. Safety was evaluated by monitoring pain levels using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and efficacy was determined by observing the changes in the fingers' range of motion using the iManus™ platform and clinical outcomes measures, namely the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT). Results: Our participant completed all the assigned sessions, with each averaging 20 min. Usability scored 77.5 out of 100 on the SUS. User feedback from the interviews revealed improved mobility and control over therapy as benefits, indicating room for improvement in the intervention's adaptability and functionality. During the intervention, the participant noted no pain increase, and the telerehabilitation platform recorded range of motion improvements for all finger and wrist joints, excluding wrist extension. The FMA scores were 43 at T0, 53 at T1, and 56 at T2, while the JTHFT scores were 223 at T0, 188 at T1, and 240 at T2. Conclusions: This single case study demonstrated the preliminary feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a novel home-based hand intervention for stroke survivors. The participant showed improved hand functions, good adherence to the program, and reported satisfaction with the intervention. However, these results are based on a single-case study, and further large-scale studies are needed before any generalization is recommended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".