MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401317954 · doi:10.1093/ced/llae308

Dual biologic or small-molecule therapy in patients with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review

2024· review· en· W4401317954 on OpenAlexaff
Dea Metko, Shanti Mehta, Eric McMullen, Megan Lam, David Croitoru

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Experimental Dermatology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkWomen's College HospitalUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtopic dermatitisMedicineDupilumabQuality of life (healthcare)MEDLINEIntensive care medicineDermatologyBiologic AgentsInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We assess the safety and effectiveness of dual biologic and small-molecule therapies in treating atopic dermatitis (AD). Despite the advancements in AD treatments, many patients exhibit poor a response to monotherapies, prompting the exploration of novel combination therapies. This systematic review included 13 studies, highlighting significant improvements in AD severity and patient outcomes, including quality of life. While the results are promising, long-term safety remains uncertain, emphasizing the need for additional research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and Experimental DermatologySame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207