Myopathic manifestations across the adult lifespan of patients with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility: a narrative review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) designates individuals at risk of developing a hypermetabolic reaction triggered by halogenated anaesthetics or the depolarising neuromuscular blocking agent suxamethonium. Over the past few decades, beyond the operating theatre, myopathic manifestations impacting daily life are increasingly recognised as a prevalent phenomenon in MHS patients. At the request of the European Malignant Hyperthermia Group, we reviewed the literature and gathered the opinion of experts to define MHS-related myopathy as a distinct phenotype expressed across the adult lifespan of MHS patients unrelated to anaesthetic exposure; this serves to raise awareness about non-anaesthetic manifestations, potential therapies, and management of MHS-related myopathy. We focused on the clinical presentation, biochemical and histopathological findings, and the impact on patient well-being. The spectrum of symptoms of MHS-related myopathy encompasses muscle cramps, stiffness, myalgias, rhabdomyolysis, and weakness, with a wide age range of onset mainly during adulthood. Histopathological analysis can reveal nonspecific abnormalities suggestive of RYR1 involvement, while metabolic profiling reflects altered energy metabolism in MHS muscle. Myopathic manifestations can significantly impact patient quality of life and lead to functional limitations and socio-economic burden. While currently available therapies can provide symptomatic relief, there is a need for further research into targeted treatments addressing the underlying pathophysiology. Counselling early after establishing the MHS diagnosis, followed by multidisciplinary management involving various medical specialties, is crucial to optimise patient care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".