Dual-Channel Fuzzy Interaction Information Fused Feature Selection With Fuzzy Sparse and Shared Granularities
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fuzzy information granularity is an effective granular computation approach for feature evaluation and selection. However, most existing methods rely on a single granulation channel, neglecting different granularity representations. In this article, a novel dual-channel fuzzy interaction information fused feature selection with fuzzy sparse and shared granularities is proposed. It mainly comprises the following three parts. First, a dual-channel framework is introduced to construct the fuzzy information granularity from two different strategies. One channel employs sparse mutual strategy to form the sparse representation-based fuzzy information granularity, while the other constructs the fuzzy shared information granularity with a novel fuzzy semi-ball. Second, in each channel, the criteria of maximum relevancy, minimum redundancy, and maximum interaction is adopted to access feature correlation and perform feature ranking. Third, the two feature sequences derived from the dual-channel are fused to form a final feature sequence based on the within-class and between-class mechanism. To validate the efficacy of the proposed method, experimental validations on 15 datasets and schizophrenia data are conducted. The results show that the proposed method outperforms other algorithms in classification accuracy and statistical analysis. Moreover, its superiority regarding accuracy can be demonstrated in the experiments of schizophrenia detection, where it performs well in recognizing schizophrenia through visual interpretation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it