MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401328662 · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2024.3438438

5G Service Function Chain Provisioning: A Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Framework

2024· article· en· W4401328662 on OpenAlexafffund
Thinh Duy Tran, Brigitte Jaumard, Quang Duong, Kim Khoa Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDigital Transformation in Industry
Canadian institutionsComputer Research Institute of MontréalConcordia UniversityÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersMitacs
KeywordsComputer scienceReinforcement learningProvisioningComputer networkFunction (biology)Chain (unit)Distributed computingArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the dynamic joint service function chain (SFC) embedding problem in a network function virtualization (NFV)-enabled edge cloud network. Our design goal is to optimize the network throughput by maximizing the average number of SFCs successfully embedded into the network, i.e., the Grade of Service (GoS), while guaranteeing their individual stringent end-to-end delay and resource constraints over a time horizon. To this end, we proposed a deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based framework for jointly performing VNF embedding and routing tasks for the arrival SFCs in the considered NFV-enabled network. We implemented two versions of the proposed framework, one with the Deep Q-learning (DQL) method and one with the Advantage Actor-Critic (A2C) as the core algorithms, respectively. Moreover, for training these DRL algorithms and demonstrating the performance of the proposed framework, we implement a network environment based on the real-world network topology and a service request generator for generating SFCs traffic. Numerical results show that the DQL and A2C versions of the proposed framework achieve over 95% of the average GoS and over 95% of the network throughput ratio compared to the upper bound. This performance level is comparable to that of the near-optimal optimization-based approach while having ten times shorter execution times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service ManagementSame topicDigital Transformation in IndustryFrench-language works237,207