ZOBNN: Zero-Overhead Dependable Design of Binary Neural Networks with Deliberately Quantized Parameters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low-precision weights and activations in deep neural networks (DNNs) outperform their full-precision counterparts in terms of hardware efficiency. When implemented with low-precision operations, specifically in the extreme case where network parameters are binarized (i.e. BNNs), the two most frequently mentioned benefits of quantization are reduced memory consumption and a faster inference process. In this paper, we introduce a third advantage of very low-precision neural networks: improved fault-tolerance attribute. We investigate the impact of memory faults on state-of-the-art binary neural networks (BNNs) through comprehensive analysis. Despite the inclusion of floating-point parameters in BNN architectures to improve accuracy, our findings reveal that BNNs are highly sensitive to deviations in these parameters caused by memory faults. In light of this crucial finding, we propose a technique to improve BNN dependability by restricting the range of float parameters through a novel deliberately uniform quantization. The introduced quantization technique results in a reduction in the proportion of floating-point parameters utilized in the BNN, without incurring any additional computational overheads during the inference stage. The extensive experimental fault simulation on the proposed BNN architecture (i.e. ZOBNN) reveal a remarkable 5X enhancement in robustness compared to conventional floating-point DNN. Notably, this improvement is achieved without incurring any computational overhead. Crucially, this enhancement comes without computational overhead. ZOBNN excels in critical edge applications characterized by limited computational resources, prioritizing both dependability and real-time performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".