MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401333404 · doi:10.58528/jap.2024.16-2.79

EU, SPS and Brexit: Comparing SPS Chapters in the CETA and the EU-UK TCA

2024· article· en· W4401333404 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gábor Hajdu

Bibliographic record

VenueJog állam politika · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and International Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrexitInternational tradeInternational economicsPolitical scienceEuropean unionEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interpretation of sanitary and phytosanitary measures in an international trade law context has always been problematic.The SPS Agreement, operating within the World Trade Organization's treaty framework, sets some basic rules, but many trade agreements contain their own SPS chapters as well.Ever since the separation of the EU and the UK, SPS measures have been a hot topic between the two sides, both considering the matter to be of particular importance.The purpose of this article is to examine how advanced the EU-UK TCA's SPS chapter is, in comparison to both the SPS Agreement and the EU-Canada CETA agreement.During this process, we will also identify potential issues and, in the conclusion, we will attempt to answer how these issues could be resolved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.851

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJog állam politikaSame topicEuropean and International Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207