MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401333956 · doi:10.1002/adom.202401064

Magnetic Circularly Polarized Luminescence with Heterometallic Molecular Cluster‐Aggregates

2024· article· en· W4401333956 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Optical Materials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsMaterials scienceLuminescenceCircular polarizationCluster (spacecraft)Magnetic circular dichroismOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Magnetic circularly polarized luminescence (MCPL) is a technique based on the differential emission of left and right circularly polarized light induced by a magnetic field. This technique is the emission counterpart of to the widely explored magnetic circular dichroism. In this work, the first demonstration of MCPL is presented in heterometallic lanthanide(III) systems by using two molecular cluster aggregates, {Eu 1 Tb 19 } and {Eu 3 Tb 17 } . The results presented here indicate the potential that MCPL holds for obtaining highly tuned magneto‐optical materials for various applications, such as anti‐counterfeiting materials. Additionally, the findings suggest that magnetic interactions between the ions modulate the dissymmetry factor, opening the possibility of the development of highly tunable MCPL materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it