MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401334731 · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c02186

Bioisosteres at C9 of 2-Deoxy-2,3-didehydro- <i>N</i> -acetyl Neuraminic Acid Identify Selective Inhibitors of NEU3

2024· article· en· W4401334731 on OpenAlexafffund
Mostafa Radwan, Tianlin Guo, Elisa Garcia Carvajal, Benjamin A. R. Bekkema, Christopher W. Cairo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicATP Synthase and ATPases Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteCanadian Glycomics NetworkNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsNeuraminic acidChemistryStereochemistryBiochemistrySialic acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human neuraminidases play critical roles in many physiological and pathological processes. Humans have four isoenzymes of NEU, making selective inhibitors important tools to investigate the function of individual isoenzymes. A typical scaffold for NEU inhibitors is 2-deoxy-2,3-didehydro- N -acetylneuraminic acid (DANA) where C9 modifications can be critical for potency and selectivity against human NEU. To design improved DANA analogues, we generated a library of compounds with either a short alkyl chain or a biphenyl substituent linked to the C9 position through one of six amide bioisosteres. Bioisostere linkers included triazole, urea, thiourea, carbamate, thiocarbamate, and sulfonamide groups. Within this library, we identified a C9 biphenyl carbamate derivative ( 963 ) that showed high selectivity and potency for NEU3 ( K i = 0.12 ± 0.01 μM). In contrast, NEU1 and NEU4 isoenzymes preferred amide and triazole linkers, respectively. Finally, analogues with urea, sulfonamide, and amide linkers showed enhanced inhibitory activity for a bacterial NEU, NanI from Clostridium perfringens .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.634

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medicinal ChemistrySame topicATP Synthase and ATPases ResearchFrench-language works237,207