MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Magnetic Actuation of Small-Scale Soft Robots

2024· article· en· W4401336572 on OpenAlexaff
Afarin Khabbazian, Mir Behrad Khamesee, Veronika Magdanz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMicro and Nano Robotics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobotScale (ratio)Computer sciencePhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soft miniaturized robots, characterized by their simple manufacturability and manipulation, offer advantages in controllability and potential for medical applications. In the context of untethered robotic systems, a notable method of actuation is the use of magnetic fields. This research concentrates on the comprehensive modeling and fabrication of soft millimeter scale filaments subjected to magnetic actuation, designed to be applied in the human urinary tract. The investigation seeks to clarify the response of magnetic soft filaments with two distinct magnetic configurations to a rotating magnetic field resulting in a fin-like and a screw-like motion. This study analyses the degree of bending and the resulting forward motion by frequency response experiments. The results show that fin-like configuration of the magnetic robot results in 3 times faster motion than the screw-like robots in tubular confinement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicro and Nano RoboticsFrench-language works237,207