The hemodynamic response to co‐occurring interictal epileptiform discharges and high‐frequency oscillations localizes the seizure‐onset zone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To use intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) to characterize functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activation maps associated with high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) (80-250 Hz) and examine their proximity to HFO- and seizure-generating tissue. METHODS: Forty-five patients implanted with intracranial depth electrodes underwent a simultaneous EEG-fMRI study at 3 T. HFOs were detected algorithmically from cleaned EEG and visually confirmed by an experienced electroencephalographer. HFOs that co-occurred with interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) were subsequently identified. fMRI activation maps associated with HFOs were generated that occurred either independently of IEDs or within ±200 ms of an IED. For all significant analyses, the Maximum, Second Maximum, and Closest activation clusters were identified, and distances were measured to both the electrodes where the HFOs were observed and the electrodes involved in seizure onset. RESULTS: We identified 108 distinct groups of HFOs from 45 patients. We found that HFOs with IEDs produced fMRI clusters that were closer to the local field potentials of the corresponding HFOs observed within the EEG than HFOs without IEDs. In addition to the fMRI clusters being closer to the location of the EEG correlate, HFOs with IEDs generated Maximum clusters with greater z-scores and larger volumes than HFOs without IEDs. We also observed that HFOs with IEDs resulted in more discrete activation maps. SIGNIFICANCE: Intracranial EEG-fMRI can be used to probe the hemodynamic response to HFOs. The hemodynamic response associated with HFOs that co-occur with IEDs better identifies known epileptic tissue than HFOs that occur independently.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".