Kalman filter-based sensor fusion for Ackermann steering mobile robots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Autonomous navigation technologies are continuously improving in terms of performance and safety. A key subfield of autonomous navigation for mobile robots is localization or precise positioning, involving the robot understanding its position relative to key points of interest in the environment. Traditionally, localization is purely dependent on the quality of input received from onboard sensors and therefore localization quality degrades in the presence of high sensor error or other faults. Sensor fusion is useful to combat this. Sensor fusion is used to combine various data types from different sensors to gain a lower overall uncertainty or error in the resulting data, when compared to the separate data from each individual sensor. In this study a four-wheel mobile robot with front-wheel driving and steering is localized during navigation. The investigation is performed in simulation and with a physical prototype. The mobile robot has several sensors including a wheel encoder on each wheel, an inertial measurement unit as well as an indoor GPS system. A designed Kalman Filter called The Combined Kalman Filter has been designed to fuse the sensor input data in order to output the position data required to localize the robot in (X, Y) cartesian coordinates. This is completed in the presence of sensor bias error and noise with the output path compared against a pre-selected ground truth trajectory. The proposed filter is based on the Extended Kalman Filter to contend with the non-linear model arising from the four-wheel steerable robot with the steering system following the Ackermann steering condition. The robot model and sensors are simulated in MATLAB for a chosen ground truth trajectory with results highlighting any detected faults and final accurate position information. It was seen that the estimated filter output had high accuracy when compared with the ground truth. Compared with other investigations the proposed filter has reduced mean error and minimal deviations compared with the ground truth path. In addition, this filtering model can be used in general for the localization of other actuated steering vehicles and aims to widen the research in this field as the majority of research in this area leverages differential drive robots which require less complex modeling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".