MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Kalman filter-based sensor fusion for Ackermann steering mobile robots

2024· article· en· W4401341489 on OpenAlex
Malik Peiris, Haoxiang Lang, Moustafa El–Gindy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAckermann functionKalman filterSensor fusionMobile robotComputer scienceFusionExtended Kalman filterRobotControl theory (sociology)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Autonomous navigation technologies are continuously improving in terms of performance and safety. A key subfield of autonomous navigation for mobile robots is localization or precise positioning, involving the robot understanding its position relative to key points of interest in the environment. Traditionally, localization is purely dependent on the quality of input received from onboard sensors and therefore localization quality degrades in the presence of high sensor error or other faults. Sensor fusion is useful to combat this. Sensor fusion is used to combine various data types from different sensors to gain a lower overall uncertainty or error in the resulting data, when compared to the separate data from each individual sensor. In this study a four-wheel mobile robot with front-wheel driving and steering is localized during navigation. The investigation is performed in simulation and with a physical prototype. The mobile robot has several sensors including a wheel encoder on each wheel, an inertial measurement unit as well as an indoor GPS system. A designed Kalman Filter called The Combined Kalman Filter has been designed to fuse the sensor input data in order to output the position data required to localize the robot in (X, Y) cartesian coordinates. This is completed in the presence of sensor bias error and noise with the output path compared against a pre-selected ground truth trajectory. The proposed filter is based on the Extended Kalman Filter to contend with the non-linear model arising from the four-wheel steerable robot with the steering system following the Ackermann steering condition. The robot model and sensors are simulated in MATLAB for a chosen ground truth trajectory with results highlighting any detected faults and final accurate position information. It was seen that the estimated filter output had high accuracy when compared with the ground truth. Compared with other investigations the proposed filter has reduced mean error and minimal deviations compared with the ground truth path. In addition, this filtering model can be used in general for the localization of other actuated steering vehicles and aims to widen the research in this field as the majority of research in this area leverages differential drive robots which require less complex modeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it