MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401343478 · doi:10.1242/dmm.050595

Generation and characterization of a mouse model of Becker muscular dystrophy with a deletion of <i>Dmd</i> exons 52 to 55

2024· article· en· W4401343478 on OpenAlexafffund
Lucie Perillat, Tatianna Wai Ying Wong, Eleonora Maino, Abdalla Ahmed, Ori Scott, Elzbieta Hyatt, Paul Delgado-Olguı́n, Shagana Visuvanathan, Evgueni A. Ivakine, Ronald D. Cohn

Bibliographic record

VenueDisease Models & Mechanisms · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHeart and Stroke FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsDystrophinMuscular dystrophyExonBiologyPhenotypeDuchenne muscular dystrophyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) is a rare X-linked recessive neuromuscular disorder, frequently caused by in-frame deletions in the DMD gene that result in the production of a truncated, yet functional, dystrophin protein. The consequences of BMD-causing in-frame deletions on the organism are difficult to predict, especially in regard to long-term prognosis. Here, we used CRISPR-Cas9 to generate a new Dmd Δ52-55 mouse model by deleting exons 52-55 in the Dmd gene, resulting in a BMD-like in-frame deletion. To delineate the long-term effects of this deletion, we studied these mice over 52 weeks by performing histology and echocardiography analyses and assessing motor functions. Our results suggest that truncated dystrophin is sufficient to maintain wildtype-like muscle and heart histology and functions in young mice. However, the truncated protein appeared to be insufficient to maintain normal muscle homeostasis and protect against exercise-induced damage at 52 weeks. To further delineate the effects of this exon 52-55 in-frame deletion, we performed RNA sequencing pre- and post-exercise and identified several differentially expressed pathways that reflect the abnormal muscle phenotype observed at 52 weeks in the BMD model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDisease Models & MechanismsSame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207