MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401346197 · doi:10.1080/23308249.2024.2383470

Population Structure and Broad-Scale Movements of Atlantic Sturgeon Along the North American Atlantic Coast Inferred from Genetic Analysis

2024· article· en· W4401346197 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Isaac Wirgin, Lorraine Maceda, Joseph Stabile, Mike Bednarski, John R. Waldman

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHudson River Foundation
KeywordsGeographyOceanographyScale (ratio)PopulationGenetic structureFisheryBiologyGeologyCartographyGenetic variationDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atlantic sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus is widely distributed along the Atlantic coast of North America, with spawning populations extending from the St. Lawrence River, Quebec to the St. Marys River, Georgia-Florida. At one time, Atlantic sturgeon supported lucrative fisheries on adults within rivers where they spawned and on subadults and adults within coastal waters. Because of decimated population sizes, Atlantic sturgeon in U.S. waters are now federally protected as five Distinct Population Segments (DPS) under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. While juvenile Atlantic sturgeon are resident within their natal rivers, subadults and adults are highly migratory in coastal waters and often occur in non-natal estuaries, exposing them to a variety of anthropogenic threats outside of their natal estuaries, including bycatch. To most effectively protect the smallest and most vulnerable populations, a method is needed to accurately identify the population origin of individual specimens and their aggregations outside of their natal systems. In this study, microsatellite DNA analysis was used to identify the genetic population structure of Atlantic sturgeon across 13 reference populations. Their genetic profiles then were used to identify the population origin of individuals collected from six coastal locales and one non-natal estuary. All 13 reference collections harbored genetically distinct, and in some cases more than one, population of Atlantic sturgeon. The Hudson River was by far the largest contributor to the overall coastal and non-natal estuarine collections, at 35.3%. The contributions of the other reference populations varied considerably between < 1.0% (York, Edisto, Savannah, and Satilla rivers) to 15.6% (Saint John River) and 12.9% (James River) and appeared unrelated to their estimated population sizes. These results suggest that migratory behavior in marine waters varies greatly among Atlantic sturgeon populations, and should assist resource managers assess the effects of anthropogenic stressors on sturgeon outside of their individual natal river or DPS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReviews in Fisheries Science & AquacultureSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207