Coesite-bearing garnet xenocrysts from diatexite in the Nordøyane domain, Western Gneiss Region, Norway: implications for eclogite-melt interaction at ultra-high pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultra-high-pressure (UHP) metamorphic rocks in the Western Gneiss Region (WGR) of Norway formed in subducted Baltican crust during the Scandian phase of the Caledonian orogeny. In the Nordøyane UHP domain, eclogites locally preserve coesite and microdiamond. Along the north coasts of Haramsøya and Flemsøya, in situ eclogite bodies are surrounded by dioritic “diatexite selvages” containing abundant eclogitic enclaves and xenocrysts. In one location eclogite and diatexite are associated with a quartz diorite dyke that is highly contaminated with eclogitic material. The diatexite matrix and dyke have similar plagioclase + quartz + biotite assemblages with abundant embayed and fragmented garnet and clinopyroxene xenocrysts. Coesite is present in some garnet xenocrysts but has not been found in the adjacent eclogite bodies. Pressure–temperature ( P– T) estimates from in situ eclogites range from 2.2–3.2 GPa and 810–840 °C, spanning the quartz–coesite transition, with P– T estimates from xenocrysts spanning a wider range. Diorites and retrogressed eclogites record amphibolite-facies conditions, ca. 1.0–1.5 GPa and 700–800 °C. The wide range and large uncertainties in P– T estimates reflect high-temperature re-equilibration and a relative lack of P-sensitive assemblages. Differences in texture, composition, and included assemblages indicate that the xenocrysts were not derived from the nearby eclogite bodies. By implication, their dioritic hosts were not locally derived but must have originated from a different, probably deeper, source. The results are integrated with a numerical model for WGR tectonic evolution to assess the sources of the melts and their possible effects on the exhumation of UHP rocks in western Norway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".