PSA-FL-CDM: A Novel Federated Learning-Based Consensus Model for Post-Stroke Assessment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid development of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies and the potential benefits of employing the vast datasets generated by IoT devices, including wearable sensors and camera systems, has ushered in a new era of opportunities for enhancing smart rehabilitation in various healthcare systems. Maintaining patient privacy is paramount in healthcare while providing smart insights and recommendations. This study proposed the adoption of federated learning to develop a scalable AI model for post-stroke assessment while protecting patients’ privacy. This research compares the centralized (PSA-MNMF) model performance with the proposed scalable federated PSA-FL-CDM model for sensor- and camera-based datasets. The computational time indicates that the federated PSA-FL-CDM model significantly reduces the execution time and attains comparable performance while preserving the patient’s privacy. Impact Statement—This research introduces groundbreaking contributions to stroke assessment by successfully implementing federated learning for the first time in this domain and applying consensus models in each node. It enables collaborative model training among multiple nodes or clients while ensuring the privacy of raw data. The study explores eight different clustering methods independently on each node, revolutionizing data organization based on similarities in stroke assessment. Additionally, the research applies the centralized PSA-MNMF consensus clustering technique to each client, resulting in more accurate and robust clustering solutions. By utilizing the FedAvg federated learning algorithm strategy, locally trained models are combined to create a global model that captures the collective knowledge of all participants. Comparative performance measurements and computational time analyses are conducted, facilitating a fair evaluation between centralized and federated learning models in stroke assessment. Moreover, the research extends beyond a single type of database by conducting experiments on two distinct datasets, wearable and camera-based, broadening the understanding of the proposed methods across different data modalities. These contributions develop stroke assessment methodologies, enabling efficient collaboration and accurate consensus clustering models and maintaining data privacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".