MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401359354 · doi:10.2514/6.2024-84784

Space Debris Mitigation: Integration of Carbon Nanotube Cold Cathode Electron Emission with Electrodynamic Tether Payload for Rapid Deorbiting of Nanosatellites

2024· article· en· W4401359354 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Design and Technology
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPayload (computing)Aerospace engineeringSpace debrisCathodeCarbon nanotubeElectronMaterials scienceAstrobiologyCold cathodePhysicsNanotechnologyEngineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringSpacecraft

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As more spacecraft are launched into Low Earth Orbit (LEO), a concerning issue arises regarding the volume of spacecraft in LEO and how these objects remain in orbit after their decommissioning. In-operable space objects, consisting of defunct or inoperative satellite, spacecraft parts, and spent launch vehicles & rockets are human made objects often called “space junk” or “orbital space debris.” Objects such as Small Satellites (SmallSats), composed of CubeSats, NanoSats, and MircoSats, are in LEO are at risk of colliding with other satellites and space laboratories. With significant growth in the international space industry, many regions of LEO are at high levels of satellite density, which increases the probability of spacecraft collisions. These collisions can cause problems with critical infrastructure such as telecommunications, earth imaging, and defence systems. The expanding landscape of SmallSat research, spanning academia and industry, underscores a notable surge in the deployment of CubeSats. Characterized by their straightforward design, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility, CubeSats have become preferred choices for universities and companies as research platforms and for various industry applications. As this technology matures, a concerted effort is underway to pioneer novel deorbiting strategies, aiming for swifter and safer removal of these satellites from orbit. As space technology matures, the demand for innovative deorbiting strategies intensifies. This study addresses this need, specifically exploring integrated solutions like Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Cold Cathode and Electrodynamic Tether (EDT). These technologies aim to enhance the efficiency and sustainability of space debris mitigation, particularly for SmallSat missions. This study looks at developing, testing, and deploying a CNT Cold Cathode Plate connected to an Electrodynamic Tether, all as a 1U CubeSat Payload. This compact form factor, being 1 CubeSat Unit, sized at 10cmx10cmx10cm allows for a small, simple, and effective solution for deorbiting a standard 2U-8U CubeSat. The use of a CNT Cold Cathode allows for the payload to emit electrons, while the EDT is collecting the electrons emitted by the CNT Cold Cathode. The use of the EDT allows the electrons to be collected, charged, and emitted again by the CNT. This payload allows the electrons to experience a force acting on them by interacting with the earth’s gravitational field. This force is called, Lorentz force, and it is the propulsive force generated when the tether, carrying an electric current, moves through the Earth's magnetic field. The CNT Cold Cathode and ETD unit allows this payload to generate a thrust through the Lorentz force, and opposes the CubeSats orbital motion, resulting in a reduction of its orbital velocity. The deployed tether also increases the atmospheric drag that the entire CubeSat is experiencing, which leads to a faster decay of orbit, leading to the quicker de-orbit of the CubeSat. The relationship of Lorentz force and atmospheric drag allow the satellite to have a controlled and effective deorbit. The process of separating CNT Cathode consists of the daughterSat which contains the CNT Cold Cathode plate, is ejected from the motherSat. This process is triggered when two locking springs embedded into the daughterSat, decompress after being disconnected from the wire tension holding it to the motherSat. This allows for wave spring to also decompress and release the entire daughterSat unit. The motherSat contains the wave spring, which propels the daughterSat out of the motherSat. The motherSat also houses the burn wire system that holds the spring locks under tension till ejection, the tether storage cylinder, and an electronics board. Looking at the payload design and layout, from the bottom of the motherSat, it contains a PCB control board, with a controller chip, memory, and interface ports, followed by a disk style tether storage cylinder in the middle, with the wave spring sitting on the top of the storage. The burn wire system is located on small ridge that is like a fence around the daughterSat. This allows for the entire payload to be a cube and sit flush against the frame of any potential CubeSat that the payload may be integrated into. The daughterSat ejects when the burn wire daughter boards, which are connected to the control board which then sends a command that burns the wire which is tensioning the locking pins, and unlocks the entire payload. The result of this system allows a SmallSat to efficiently deorbit quicker, yielding in LEO to not be cluttered with space junk, risking damage to active spacecraft and space stations. This type of payload can be developed in budget & time efficient manner, allowing for this type of payload to be integrated into all sorts of academic and industry projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpacecraft Design and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207