MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4401359354 · doi:10.2514/6.2024-84784

Space Debris Mitigation: Integration of Carbon Nanotube Cold Cathode Electron Emission with Electrodynamic Tether Payload for Rapid Deorbiting of Nanosatellites

2024· article· en· W4401359354 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueSpacecraft Design and Technology
Établissements canadiensYork University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPayload (computing)Aerospace engineeringSpace debrisCathodeCarbon nanotubeElectronMaterials scienceAstrobiologyCold cathodePhysicsNanotechnologyEngineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringSpacecraft

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As more spacecraft are launched into Low Earth Orbit (LEO), a concerning issue arises regarding the volume of spacecraft in LEO and how these objects remain in orbit after their decommissioning. In-operable space objects, consisting of defunct or inoperative satellite, spacecraft parts, and spent launch vehicles & rockets are human made objects often called “space junk” or “orbital space debris.” Objects such as Small Satellites (SmallSats), composed of CubeSats, NanoSats, and MircoSats, are in LEO are at risk of colliding with other satellites and space laboratories. With significant growth in the international space industry, many regions of LEO are at high levels of satellite density, which increases the probability of spacecraft collisions. These collisions can cause problems with critical infrastructure such as telecommunications, earth imaging, and defence systems. The expanding landscape of SmallSat research, spanning academia and industry, underscores a notable surge in the deployment of CubeSats. Characterized by their straightforward design, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility, CubeSats have become preferred choices for universities and companies as research platforms and for various industry applications. As this technology matures, a concerted effort is underway to pioneer novel deorbiting strategies, aiming for swifter and safer removal of these satellites from orbit. As space technology matures, the demand for innovative deorbiting strategies intensifies. This study addresses this need, specifically exploring integrated solutions like Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Cold Cathode and Electrodynamic Tether (EDT). These technologies aim to enhance the efficiency and sustainability of space debris mitigation, particularly for SmallSat missions. This study looks at developing, testing, and deploying a CNT Cold Cathode Plate connected to an Electrodynamic Tether, all as a 1U CubeSat Payload. This compact form factor, being 1 CubeSat Unit, sized at 10cmx10cmx10cm allows for a small, simple, and effective solution for deorbiting a standard 2U-8U CubeSat. The use of a CNT Cold Cathode allows for the payload to emit electrons, while the EDT is collecting the electrons emitted by the CNT Cold Cathode. The use of the EDT allows the electrons to be collected, charged, and emitted again by the CNT. This payload allows the electrons to experience a force acting on them by interacting with the earth’s gravitational field. This force is called, Lorentz force, and it is the propulsive force generated when the tether, carrying an electric current, moves through the Earth's magnetic field. The CNT Cold Cathode and ETD unit allows this payload to generate a thrust through the Lorentz force, and opposes the CubeSats orbital motion, resulting in a reduction of its orbital velocity. The deployed tether also increases the atmospheric drag that the entire CubeSat is experiencing, which leads to a faster decay of orbit, leading to the quicker de-orbit of the CubeSat. The relationship of Lorentz force and atmospheric drag allow the satellite to have a controlled and effective deorbit. The process of separating CNT Cathode consists of the daughterSat which contains the CNT Cold Cathode plate, is ejected from the motherSat. This process is triggered when two locking springs embedded into the daughterSat, decompress after being disconnected from the wire tension holding it to the motherSat. This allows for wave spring to also decompress and release the entire daughterSat unit. The motherSat contains the wave spring, which propels the daughterSat out of the motherSat. The motherSat also houses the burn wire system that holds the spring locks under tension till ejection, the tether storage cylinder, and an electronics board. Looking at the payload design and layout, from the bottom of the motherSat, it contains a PCB control board, with a controller chip, memory, and interface ports, followed by a disk style tether storage cylinder in the middle, with the wave spring sitting on the top of the storage. The burn wire system is located on small ridge that is like a fence around the daughterSat. This allows for the entire payload to be a cube and sit flush against the frame of any potential CubeSat that the payload may be integrated into. The daughterSat ejects when the burn wire daughter boards, which are connected to the control board which then sends a command that burns the wire which is tensioning the locking pins, and unlocks the entire payload. The result of this system allows a SmallSat to efficiently deorbit quicker, yielding in LEO to not be cluttered with space junk, risking damage to active spacecraft and space stations. This type of payload can be developed in budget & time efficient manner, allowing for this type of payload to be integrated into all sorts of academic and industry projects.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,121
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,532

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,212
Écart entre enseignants0,207 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

En bref

Citations1
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetSpacecraft Design and TechnologyTravaux en français237 207