MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Airborne Electromagnetic Data Leveling Based on Structured Model

2024· article· en· W4401360848 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Qiong Zhang, Zhengkun Jin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceData modelingComputational electromagneticsAtmospheric modelRemote sensingDatabaseElectromagnetic fieldGeologyMeteorologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Airborne electromagnetic method has the advantages of fast and efficient, non-contact, multi-parameter acquisition, high cost performance and strong adaptability, and has been widely used in geological mapping, mineral resources, underground water sources, environment and engineering exploration. However, because the flight mode is inevitably affected, the data difference between routes will be generated. This difference in data is represented in the imaging system as a bar graph parallel to the flight line. This structural model motivates us to build a leveling error model utilizing an anisotropic Gabor filter. Then the leveling error model is embedded into the total variational frame to avoid blind removal of leveling error. In addition, the structured variational method can also be expanded to eliminate various other types of noise with a broad prior noise assumption. We utilized the method on airborne magnetic data gathered by the Geological Survey of Ontario and juxtaposed the outcomes with published data to authenticate its reliability. Leveraging the spatial attributes of leveling error, the structured variational method proves beneficial for effectively leveling aerial geophysical data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207