MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enhancing Electrical Transformer Fault Prediction with Deep Learning: A Focus on ANN-Based Classification

2024· article· en· W4401360884 on OpenAlexaff
Hanane Hadiki, Fouad Slaoui Hasnaoui, Georges Semaan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTransformerArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMachine learningArtificial neural networkFault (geology)EngineeringElectrical engineeringGeologyVoltageSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrical transformers play an essential role in the power distribution network, acting as key connectors that facilitate the flow of electricity over large distances to meet diverse power needs. Despite their reliability, the rare occurrence of faults emphasizes the necessity for diligent maintenance to maintain their peak performance. The significant expenses linked to both the maintenance and repair of these components highlight the imperative for innovative maintenance strategies that extend beyond traditional approaches. This situation underscores the urgent need for maintenance strategies that surpass conventional methods. Our study leverages two unique datasets: one featuring data on three-phase currents and voltages and the other including seven essential indicators of transformer health. To predict faults within these datasets, we employ advanced deep learning techniques, specifically using Feedforward Back-propagation neural networks, demonstrating the potential of modern methodologies in enhancing the reliability and efficiency of electrical transformers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Transformer Diagnostics and InsulationFrench-language works237,207