An Innovative Instructional Model to Foster Creative Thinking in Primary School Students in Thailand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research endeavors to address the pressing need for nurturing creative thinking skills among primary school students in the context of Mahasarakham province, Thailand. By systematically analyzing the specific challenges and requirements faced by educators, a comprehensive model for enhancing creative thinking skills was developed. This model integrates multidisciplinary methods, hands-on realistic tasks, and combines STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) education with the 6E technique. The study demonstrates the model's effectiveness in significantly improving creative thinking skills among students. The key findings underscore the value of multidisciplinary approaches, emphasizing experiential learning through practical tasks that stimulate creativity. The fusion of STEAM education and the 6E technique proved to be particularly impactful, aligning with prior research in the field. The research contributes vital insights and practical recommendations for educators and policymakers, urging them to consider multidisciplinary methods, STEAM education, and the 6E technique as viable strategies to bolster creative thinking skills in primary school students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".