MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401372362 · doi:10.25144/23542

DIGITAL COMPUTER ANALYSIS OF ECHO SOUNDER DATA FOR FISH IDENTIFICATION

2024· article· en· W4401372362 on OpenAlexfundno aff
DQM FAY

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQueen's University
KeywordsShoalEcho soundingComputer scienceEcho (communications protocol)Identification (biology)Fish <Actinopterygii>SonarSampling (signal processing)Target strengthPattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionRemote sensingArtificial intelligenceFisheryGeographyEcologyGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No main advantages of using a computer with anecho sounder are:l.the skipper can have much better choice of what information should be displayed and what type of stand-by slams are required, and 2. the computer is able to make a fine analysis of the echo and to intensify the display of significant echoes such as fish shoals, marking these when possible with information on estimated fish size and shoal density.This paper describes the techniques used for data capture, bottom quality determination, fish and shoal identification, interaction with theskipper, and data display.The computer techniques include sampling and analogue to digital conversion, intercomunicating multiple processors, pattern recognition, self adaptive pattern recognition, corref' ations, human interface and hard copy and video display.Where possible results of fish target strength data obtained from fisheries research laboratories are used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207