The Impact of Combined Application of Donepezil and Nimodipine on Patients with Comorbid Cerebral Small Vessel Disease and Cognitive Dysfunction: Efficacy and Influence on Nutritional Status
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) often coexists with cognitive dysfunction in patients, leading to significant challenges in treatment and management. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of combined application of donepezil and nimodipine on patients with comorbid CSVD and cognitive dysfunction and the effects on patients' albumin and prealbumin levels. METHODS: The records of 112 patients with comorbid CSVD and cognitive dysfunction treated at the People's Hospital of Suzhou New District from January 2019 to December 2022 were analysed retrospectively. A total of 50 patients receiving donepezil were allocated to the control group, and 62 patients receiving both nimodipine and donepezil to the study group. Outcomes compared between the two groups included serum homocysteine (Hcy), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), albumin, and prealbumin before and after therapy, efficacy, and adverse reactions. Additionally, logistic regression was performed to analyze the risk factors impacting patient prognosis. RESULTS: Prior to therapy, the two groups did not differ significantly in Hcy and hs-CRP levels (p > 0.05), whereas after therapy, the levels in both groups dropped significantly (p < 0.01), with more obvious lower levels in the study group (p < 0.05). After treatment, the study group presented significantly higher albumin and prealbumin levels than the control group (p < 0.001). An obvious higher overall response rate was observed in the study group compared to the control group (p = 0.012). No significant inter-group discrepancy was found regarding the total incidence of adverse reactions (p = 0.752). Univariate analysis identified age, course of disease, heart rate (HR), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), drinking history, as well as medication regimen as risk factors impacting patient prognosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified SBP, DBP, and medication regimen as the independent risk factors. CONCLUSION: Combined application of donepezil and nimodipine can effectively treat patients with comorbid CSVD and cognitive dysfunction. It can significantly lower the Hcy and hs-CRP levels and improve the nutritional status without increasing the frequency of adverse reactions. In addition, for CSVD patients with cognitive dysfunction, age, course of disease, MoCA score, HR, SBP, DBP, drinking history, and medication regimen are risk factors impacting patient prognosis, while SBP, DBP, and medication regimen are independent risk factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".