MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401380032 · doi:10.1093/oncolo/oyae181.027

9 Delving into molecular underpinnings of sarcomatoid/rhabdoid dedifferentioation in renal cancers using spatial profiling

2024· article· en· W4401380032 on OpenAlexaff
Yasser Riazalhosseini

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Oncologist · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscriptomePhenotypeBiologyClear cell renal cell carcinomaRenal cell carcinomaComputational biologyExomePathologyExome sequencingBioinformaticsMedicineGeneGeneticsGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are characterized by their largely diverse clinical outcomes. Leveraging genomic diversity among individual tumors, our research during the past decade has concentrated on developing personalized medicine approaches for the most common and the most aggressive type of RCC, clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC). We generated the largest dataset of ccRCC including somatic genomic and clinical annotations for over 940 ccRCC patients, and developed a genomic classifier, based on mutational status of 12 RCC-relevant genes, which is able to stratify patients according to their risk of relapse after nephrectomy and/or death due to RCC. Furthermore, we noticed the presence of mesenchymal-like cellular phenotypes in tumors of high-risk patients, representsing a de-differentiation process, known as sarcomatoic or rhabdoid (S/R) de-differentation. Methods The current knowledge about molecular mechanisms that may drive S/R de-differentiation is primarily generated from molecular profiling of bulk tumors, collecting data from a mixture of cells that co-exist in the tumor milieu. Therefore, high-resolution studies that precisely define molecular characteristics of different cellular phenotypes associated with S/R features are missing. We have used spatial transcriptomic profiling to investigate molecular mechanisms that underline S/R de-differentationin RCC. While preserving tissue context, we applied spatial whole human transcriptome profiling to areas exhibiting S/R or clear cell phenotypes within the same tumor specimens to generate phenotype-specific transcriptome profiles. In addition, we applied whole-exome sequencing (WES) to independent areas that exhibit different differentiation phenotype withing same tumors. Results Pathway and network analysis of genesets with upregulation in each area have revealed meaningful differences in cellular pathways which are active in each phenotype. Specifically, we observed that dysregulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) is a hallmark of S/R areas within RCC tumors. Furthermore, WES of phenotypically-distinct areas within each tumor has shed new light son the genome evoltuion of S/R phenotypes. Conclusions S/R dedifferentiation in RCC tumors is characterized by specific genomic evolutionary patterns and substantial dysregulation of ECM components. DOD CDMRP Funding: yes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe OncologistSame topicRenal cell carcinoma treatmentFrench-language works237,207