Water conflicts and sustainable development: concepts, impacts, and management approaches
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Water scarcity has caused humans to lose their ability to produce food and energy and caused conflicts to access water in agricultural, industrial, and municipal sectors at international, regional, national, and local levels. The water crisis disrupts water resources’ ecological, social, and economic values and functions. These issues have gradually endangered people’s food security and social satisfaction and have emerged in migrations, social conflicts, and violence. In recent years, we have witnessed protests in different areas as a result of the water crisis and policies related to it. Indeed, the water crisis has led to public dissatisfaction. Water conflicts arise when there is a limited and unequal distribution of water resources, leading to tension between different stakeholders such as local communities, governments, and industries. Achieving sustainable development requires the effective management and allocation of water resources to ensure equal access to water is provided for all and to reduce any negative effects that come with water usage on the environment. The impacts of water conflicts can be environmental, resulting in water scarcity, water pollution, loss of aquatic biodiversity, and damaged ecosystems. There are also socioeconomic impacts such as reduced access to water, displacement of communities, and conflict amongst user groups. Different management approaches proposed to address water conflicts and promote sustainable development include sustainable water governance, integrated water resources management, and community-based management. These approaches aim to balance water use, promote efficient and sustainable water use, and enhance the resilience of water systems amidst environmental and socioeconomic changes. In general, managing water resources sustainably is crucial for promoting economic, social, and environmental well-being. Addressing water conflicts is an essential step in achieving sustainable development. The chapter systematically reviews and explains the concepts, causes, different categories, and impacts of water conflicts and their relations with sustainable development. It also argues for water conflict management approaches and policy implications for sustainable development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it